NEWS

Education 10 June 2022 comments 1

What lessons have higher education institutions learned from the pandemic?

During the lockdowns, higher education institutions had to quickly switch over to online teaching. Time now to take stock: what worked well and what didn’t?

To allow education to continue as much as possible during the pandemic, educational institutions were given space to deviate from laws and regulations. For institutions, that space was laid out in ‘service documents’. In a study for OCW, the researchers at Berenschot took a close look at what new lessons can be learned from the exercise.

Online classes

The study shows that higher education institutions don’t want to completely dispense with online teaching post-pandemic. Since the Covid-19 restrictions ended, digital teaching has been “largely dispensed with”, but will not disappear completely.

There are, however, big differences in the degree to which institutions want to use it, the researchers found, because during the pandemic it also became clear “how important the social component of teaching is”.

Accessibility

But in fact it made teaching more accessible for some students. Students with disabilities or chronic illness actually had more opportunities to participate in classes remotely.

According to a majority of the institutions, distance education had no effect on students’ study progress. “In general, students did not earn fewer credits, although the long-term effects are not yet visible”, the researchers write in their report.

Less enjoyment

It is remarkable that the course results did not – for the time being – suffer due to the pandemic, because distance education did not get off to a smooth start everywhere. The quality of education, according to the institutions, was “not immediately at the right level”. Lecturers mainly ran into technical problems. Some lecturers also “more often remained attached to traditional methods of teaching and derived less enjoyment from digital teaching”. Others seized on this as a chance to sharpen their digital skills.

The researchers were told that students “in general seemed to absorb less of the teaching material”. There was less interaction and the lecturers didn’t always know whether students were able to follow lectures and seminars, especially if their cameras were turned off. Workload also increased for lecturers because they had to keep switching between online and offline teaching.

Creative solutions

The pandemic presented an opportunity to renew the discussion around teaching. There was less talk about “set standards and hours” and more focus on students’ skills and competences. At the same time, “institutions and experts” saw that some programmes had trouble breaking old patterns and “directly utilising the space offered”.

Minister of Education Dijkgraaf hopes that institutions will keep thinking as creatively as during the crisis, he writes in a response to the study. He is challenging them “to make maximum use of the existing space in laws and regulations”, and encouraging them to share their knowledge of online teaching with each other.

HOP/JvE, translation by Taalcentrum-VU
IMAGE: Pete Haas, Unsplash

{ Read the 1 comments}

Door Rick Vermunt (UB) op 16 June 2022
The library supports education and research, but the library also gives lectures and workshops, which in itself are forms of education, though not always part of learning line or curriculum. The following phrase "But in fact it made teaching more accessible for some students. Students with disabilities or chronic illness actually had more opportunities to participate in classes remotely" is entirely true. And that is why the paradigm 'VU is a campus university' does not hold (in fact VU is not since students and staff do not live on campus premises) One of VU's spearheads is that it strives to be inclusive. Well, that implies inclusive to everybody. Also those that - for any reason - cannot physically attend classes and such. There is merit to online education. Not only for what I mentioned above. In the 1st lock down I soon noticed a couple of things: 1. Zoom enables me to address students in lectures and workshops by name. Since my education events are a single event , there is no way I know them. This makes it, oddly, more intimate and creates a safer environment. 2. It easier to activate my message simply by letting students do excercises (i.e. information skills) . Hands on always leads to better understanding. On line saves the trouble of having to book a computer room. 3. Easier to keep my distance to students and still be friendly. Personally I feel uneasy having to look over the shoulder of a participant what's on their screen and have to invade their personal space. (think of #metoo) > screen share solves that (in zoom and teams) The challenge for the future is to combine the benifits of on line education with face to face.

Reply?

Stick to the subject, and show respect: commercial expressions, defamation, verbal abuse and discrimination are not allowed. The editors do not argue about deleted responses.

Deze vraag is om te controleren dat u een mens bent, om geautomatiseerde invoer (spam) te voorkomen.